Failure to Communicate part 2.jpg

Failure to Communicate

After a few years in the world of academia, I began to notice significant problems in the way scientists are both implicitly and explicitly encouraged to interact with the general public. Looking to call attention to the ways science communication fails and offer some possible solutions, I wrote a two-part opinion piece in collaboration with NeuWrite SF, which was published in the UCSF student newspaper, Synapse.

Scroll through to read highlighted quotes, or find the full piece here and here.

The unspoken agreement around that table was that a person who didn’t trust or value the scientific consensus must be confused, overzealous, or just plain stupid.

 

In scientific conversation, we try not to take it personally when our peers point out flaws in our thinking.

Early on, though, it hurts. It’s deeply uncomfortable to challenge the things we believe.

The truth is, the version of science taught in the classroom is nothing like the science done by scientists.

Scientific evidence is rarely neat, and by glossing over failed experiments and complex results, we’re omitting important information.